Chapter One “The
Evolving Educational Landscape”:
“Digital Learners
prefer to learn ‘just in time’ but many educators prefer to teach ‘just in
case” (Sheninger, 2014). I believe
the author is correct about this. I have
long thought that people, in general do what they have to, when they have to,
and usually not before. This includes
learning. Certainly, the internet enables this behavior. When you have access to almost any source at
any time, it’s easy to feel that you can look it up when exigency arises. However, I think both the “just in time” and
the “just in case” attitudes miss the point of education. Both seem to suggest that education can only
be a form of training- as if everything we learn is prepare us for job… and
that’s it. I have always encouraged my
students to approach their learning as if they are not merely playing the game
of school, but as if they are pursuing their interests and curiosities in order
become better people with a greater understanding of the world and how it
works. Freely learning all the time-
It’s the original meaning of “liberal” in “Liberal Arts Education.”
“Digital Learners
prefer to network simultaneously with others, but many educators prefer
students to work independently before they network and interact” (Sheninger, 2014). I selected this characteristic, because out
of all of those identified by Jukes, Mccain, and Crockett, this was the only
one that I was skeptical about. I would
like to see some evidence that students prefer to network and interact while
attempting to learn something or create a product. Most of my students fight against the idea
working together. Usually group projects
begin with me calming their anxieties or giving them some version of a “it’s
for your own good” speech.
Chapter Two “Why
Schools Must Change”:
My favorite NASSP
guidelines are as follows:
“Principals must
support early adopters and risk takers” (Sheninger, 2014). I feel this is key to encouraging the use of
technology in schools. If principals are
willing to defend teachers when they try to implement a new idea, they are
likely to see much more innovation from the staff. Also, as a teacher, nothing makes me feel
more encouraged than when the administration is supportive of a new approach to
reaching the students.
“The principal must
set and support the expectation that student work will be done and stored using
technology” (Sheninger, 2014). After
two years of requiring that students submit their English coursework
electronically, I can see the advantages of this. Both the student and the teacher are more
organized, the students receive feedback more quickly making them more likely
to revise and submit multiple improvements, and the student gains experience
using electronic documents which are common in college and work. However, I do not think many principals have
quite reached the point of thinking of this as the standard. I would like to see that change happen soon.
3 comments:
I find it interesting that you are skeptical about the 'networking simultaneously with others' quote from chapter 1. I have taught math and computer tech now, and my students are less anxious when I allow them to work together to complete their work. They end up teaching each other and helping each other figure out the steps necessary to complete the assignment. However, it isn't really "group work", it is individual work that they can assist each other. My shy students really like that I allow them to ask their peers for help. Many are afraid to ask me, so giving them another option eases their stress.
For me personally, I would rather work with someone else when it comes to material that I am unsure about; even if it is just to bounce questions and ideas off of them.
I think the way you let them work together in math may be more of what they authors had in mind when they wrote that. I teach English, and I think most students have a tough time imagining that research or writing can be anything other than an individual effort.
Jared, I like your comment, "Also, as a teacher, nothing makes me feel more encouraged than when the administration is supportive of a new approach to reaching the students." I believe when leaders support (early adopters) teachers it cultivates a school environment that promotes change and flexibility. If we don't embrace risk takers and provide guidance, we stifle teachers and students - we basically deny their creativity. In my opinion, when administration neglects to acknowledge early adopters, it's because of the fear..."I'm no longer going to have control".
Post a Comment